Tools & Resources to Shift Power to Communities
Browse Menu
Looking at your role/function within your foundation.
What are listening practices that can shift power?
Assess how you are listening through a set of reflection questions.
Engaging in other large-scale listening activities
For funders committed to shifting power to, and sharing power with, those most impacted by their work, participation is key. Participatory approaches in philanthropy center the leadership, wisdom, and voices of communities. They shift power from philanthropy’s traditional power centers (i.e., the donors and institutions that control the money) to the people and communities directly affected by the issues being addressed.
Resources to shift power
- Fund for Shared Insight
- Seara Grundhoefer & Melinda Tuan
- via Candid
- Rabya Hassen
- Mortenson Family Foundation
Get inspired by what other funders are working on

When the William Penn Foundation began its most recent strategic planning process, which it undertakes about every ten years, it started with a survey of more than 400 grantees and an additional 200 “grass tops” interviews with grantee and community leaders about the funder’s past grantmaking. To explore future areas of grantmaking focus, the foundation spoke with 116 community and organizational leaders, advocates, and researchers. Later, to market test the outlines of a plan that was starting to emerge against the priorities of the community, the foundation worked with consultants to have 254 additional conversations with community members, nonprofit and government staff, and researchers. At multiple stages, the foundation made sure to include people and organizations who weren’t coming to them with grant requests. William Penn posted program-specific summaries of the feedback on its website, and when the final strategic plan was ready in the summer of 2024, it hosted four briefings in neighborhoods around Philadelphia and online — attended by more than 1,000 people — sharing how community input had helped shape its decisions and inviting additional feedback and questions.

When the Mortenson Family Foundation was established in 1999, it operated much like many others — through a transactional approach and with more or less top-down decision making. One of its three grantmaking programs accepted applications by invitation only, and across all programs, foundation staff reviewed applications and proposed grants to the governing board, which ultimately decided how funds were distributed. Now, each program’s grantmaking committee consists of five community leaders and no more than four Mortenson family members — a deliberate structure that ensures community voices hold the majority.
The work of reconstituting the grantmaking committees was a collaborative process from the start: with the foundation making it clear that they “weren’t going to ask community members to sit at a table already set, but instead have them be part of determining what the grantmaking would look like.”
Before the foundation invited people to join the committees, it invited them — grant partners and applicants, community leaders, and anyone interested in the issues — to listening sessions where they shared their ideas about grantmaking and whom should be involved. Through that process and with input from committee members once they were seated, programs, like Mortenson’s Expanding Opportunities for Children and Families, were completely reimagined, with rewritten guidelines, revamped application processes, and entirely new review practices.


When The Ford Family Foundation learned that families in one of the Oregon towns where it works wanted stronger pathways to kindergarten for their children, it did not jump to a quick decision, such as to build a new preschool. Instead, the funder spent years supporting relationship-building in the community, creating dialogue to understand barriers around school readiness, and building trust and muscles for community organizing.
“If a new preschool was a solution we had prescribed for the community, would families really want to take their kids there? Would the town have rallied?” asked Kara Inae Carlisle, president and CEO of The Ford Family Foundation. “What Yoncalla did, through their own process, was begin to think about what they wanted for their community, what they wanted for their kids, how they wanted the school to operate.”
Pointing to Yoncalla Early Works, the community hub providing preschool and other services that was eventually built with the foundation’s support, Carlisle said she recognizes that the foundation could not have created it alone, or by simply providing funding. “We can’t grant-make our way out of any of these issues,” she said. Instead, for every effort the foundation takes on, she said, “we think about what power we want to hold and what we don’t want to hold,” and where the foundation can build capacity among others, especially by helping to activate the sometimes “invisible capital” within communities.


When The Ford Family Foundation began to shift its rural community building strategy from “leadership development” to “community development,” a new staff position — field coordinator — played a significant role in implementing the change. Neither program officers nor grant makers, field coordinators are remote employees charged with extending the reach of the foundation in the rural communities and regions where they live. These “ground truthers,” according to a report, “How Philanthropy Can ‘Go to Where the People Are,’” ensure that programmatic strategies never stray far from the realties in rural communities.
The Ford Family Foundation, which makes grants throughout Oregon and Siskiyou County, California, with a focus on rural areas, also maintains vehicles for other staff, who are also likely to live in rural communities, to travel around the state building in-person relationships and dialogue.


During a process to reimagine its strategy, Deaconess Foundation worked with a consultative project team to engage people in its region (Missouri and Illinois) and nationally, ultimately collecting feedback from 663 community members and policy analysts through neighborhood and community gatherings, grant partner focus groups, one-on-one interviews, and national peer funder conversations.
The purpose of the listening was to give the foundation a better sense of what mattered to individuals and their families and how its strategy could more closely align with their hopes and aspirations for the future. One of the listening exercises employed at public events was designed around posters that listed racial-equity benchmarking indicators. Attendees were invited to write their zip code on sticky notes, placing them on the indicators that best reflected an area in their life in which they wanted to see change. They were also invited to add written feedback about why they chose a certain indicator, how changes related to it would impact their lives, and what organizational values Deaconess would need to adopt to help achieve those changes.


Explore this menu to spark the changes you want to see.
Mix and match to find the examples, resources, and reflections best suited to help you and your organization shift power to the people and communities at the heart of your work.
How to use the menu
Funders are moving toward listening and participatory practices at different rates and from different starting points and perspectives. We also know that shifting power is not easy work and requires a strong internal commitment and continuous learning. It’s best to be clear on your organization’s motivations, capabilities, and goals. As you engage with this menu, consider your funding practices, operations, policies, and values — and then identify where change will best serve your foundation and the people and communities you seek to serve.
We recommend examining the menu’s resources and examples with a willingness to turn kernels of ideas into something right for you. No matter where you start or the path you travel through this menu, we suggest spending time on the reflection questions, perhaps engaging colleagues to help you and your organization better understand and prepare for what it means to listen to shift power.
Our Participatory Philanthropy Toolkit, included as a resource in the menu, has a Funder Readiness Assessment that can be adapted to different listening practices and help prepare you to make changes in your priorities and practices.
How we choose the items
We offer a range of examples and resources because there are no one-size-fits-all solutions; and we share them in a menu format so you can choose what’s interesting or relevant to you and your foundation. We don’t rank the practices or the organizations employing them or intend to signal that any featured funder has met its listening goals across the board. Each example represents only a moment in time — a practice one of your peers told us (or an intermediary) about, and that we hope might inspire you to enhance your own listening work.
Similarly, we do not rank the resources, though we did select them based on a set of criteria, including:
- We and/or our partners have personally used the resource and find it is high-quality, promotes impact, and aligns with our power analysis
- The resource is widely and publicly available (not just to paid members) and, ideally, accessible to people with disabilities
- The resource is relevant to, and includes applicable lessons for, a variety of types of funders
- The resource is as evergreen as possible
New resources are always coming online. We hope that the ones we’ve included are helpful while also sparking your curiosity and helping you forge an ongoing relationship with the creators and other aligned efforts.
We are always looking to add more funder listening examples and more resources. Please reach out to our communications manager, Debra Blum, or take a few minutes to share your stories and ideas on our Lift Up Listening online form.
Have questions about the menu or ideas for resources or examples?
Please reach out to our communications manager, Debra Blum.
Explore this menu to spark the changes you want to see.
Mix and match to find the examples, resources, and reflections best suited to help you and your organization shift power to the people and communities at the heart of your work.
How to use the menu
Funders are moving toward listening and participatory practices at different rates and from different starting points and perspectives. We also know that shifting power is not easy work and requires a strong internal commitment and continuous learning. It’s best to be clear on your organization’s motivations, capabilities, and goals. As you engage with this menu, consider your funding practices, operations, policies, and values — and then identify where change will best serve your foundation and the people and communities you seek to serve.
We recommend examining the menu’s resources and examples with a willingness to turn kernels of ideas into something right for you. No matter where you start or the path you travel through this menu, we suggest spending time on the reflection questions, perhaps engaging colleagues to help you and your organization better understand and prepare for what it means to listen to shift power.
Our Participatory Philanthropy Toolkit, included as a resource in the menu, has a Funder Readiness Assessment that can be adapted to different listening practices and help prepare you to make changes in your priorities and practices.
How we choose the items
We offer a range of examples and resources because there are no one-size-fits-all solutions; and we share them in a menu format so you can choose what’s interesting or relevant to you and your foundation. We don’t rank the practices or the organizations employing them or intend to signal that any featured funder has met its listening goals across the board. Each example represents only a moment in time — a practice one of your peers told us (or an intermediary) about, and that we hope might inspire you to enhance your own listening work.
Similarly, we do not rank the resources, though we did select them based on a set of criteria, including:
- We and/or our partners have personally used the resource and find it is high-quality, promotes impact, and aligns with our power analysis
- The resource is widely and publicly available (not just to paid members) and, ideally, accessible to people with disabilities
- The resource is relevant to, and includes applicable lessons for, a variety of types of funders
- The resource is as evergreen as possible
New resources are always coming online. We hope that the ones we’ve included are helpful while also sparking your curiosity and helping you forge an ongoing relationship with the creators and other aligned efforts.
We are always looking to add more funder listening examples and more resources. Please reach out to our communications manager, Debra Blum, or take a few minutes to share your stories and ideas on our Lift Up Listening online form.
Have questions about the menu or ideas for resources or examples?
Please reach out to our communications manager, Debra Blum.